Cherokee Nation vs. State of Georgia
Before the State of Georgia said that they wanted to go to trial with the Cherokee Nation because Georgia felt that the Cherokee Nation should not be consider a nation. Georgia argued, in order to be nation you first have to be independent something Georgia felt they the Cherokee's were not. During the time the Cherokee's were on Georgia's "Soil"something that the state was really up against because they said that the cherokees should most defiantly not be consider citizens. Their natives and thats how they should be looked like. None the little did Georgia know that the Cherokee were announced a nation by the United States. The United States had treaties among each other and that something Georgia had no jurisdiction.
When presenting the cast, the court automatically said their was no case that should be present because Georgia could not go against any treaties that are made under the laws of following the constitution. When going against the Law; Article 3 section 2: the laws of the United State and treaties made between citizens of the same state claiming land under grants of different states, and between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states citizens or subject. The argument used by the Cherokee's to defend their side of the argument that the State of Georgia could not go up against and interfere with the treaties that were made.
This case was important not just in Georgia but also in the United States because laws were being present and sometimes even passed when some of the laws that were being made were going against the United States Constitution. This case was not won nor lost because their was not case that they felt was power and that their was something that should be argued and that should have a defiant decision if the Cherokees should stay in Gerogia or not.